Skip to content
Cover of Looking for Rights in All the Wrong Places: Why State Constitutions Contain America's Positive Rights (Princeton Studies in American Politics: Historical, International, and Comparative Perspectives)

Looking for Rights in All the Wrong Places: Why State Constitutions Contain America's Positive Rights (Princeton Studies in American Politics: Historical, International, and Comparative Perspectives)

by Emily Zackin

StatesCivil rightsConstitutional lawConstitutional law, united statesCivil rights, united statesLaw

"Unlike many national constitutions, which contain explicit positive rights to such things as education, a living wage, and a healthful environment, the U.S. Bill of Rights appears to contain only a long list of prohibitions on government. American constitutional rights, we are often told, protect people only from an overbearing government, but give no explicit guarantees of governmental help. Looking for Rights in All the Wrong Places argues that we have fundamentally misunderstood the American rights tradition. The United States actually has a long history of enshrining positive rights in its constitutional law, but these rights have been overlooked simply because they are not in the federal Constitution. Emily Zackin shows how they instead have been included in America's state constitutions, in large part because state governments, not the federal government, have long been primarily responsible for crafting American social policy. Although state constitutions, seemingly mired in trivial detail, can look like pale imitations of their federal counterpart, they have been sites of serious debate, reflect national concerns, and enshrine choices about fundamental values. Zackin looks

Writing a summary for young readers…

For young readers

Book data: Open Library